Skip to main content

RTO VS IPO (Canada)


There are different method to take your company public in Canada: initial public offering, reverse takeover, and direct listing. There are several advantages and few disadvantages of reverse takeover (RTO) over initial public offering (IPO). 

An IPO requires a preparation, filing and clearance of prospectus which is subject of review and approval by the securities exchange commission. Disclosure document for RTO includes prospectus level disclosure with respect to the private company. In addition disclosure documents relation to RTO transaction will not be subject to review by commission. Private company will undergo due diligence and disclose information which  it has not previously  made public, including three years of audited financials.

The private company will also need to conduct due diligence  of the public company to ensure that it is not inheriting any material unknown or unforeseen liabilities and that public company is up to date with its securities regulatory requirements.

If public company isn't a shell company and has substantial assets and operation there might be strategic reasons for combining business while still retaining advantages of being  a public company. Management also may have valuable industry relationships that could be useful. Public company will also provide a private company with shareholders which will help with meeting stock exchange public float and distribution requirements. In this way private company will be able to leverage public company's existing listing and liquidity. If public company is a shell company its shareholders may benefit from increased liquidity after RTO is complete.

The amount of capital raised through any private placement financing in a conjunction with the RTO  is usually much less than capital raised trough IPO. The RTO is beneficial for companies that don't have immediate need for capital.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OTC stocks more difficult to trade and deposit

  Mina Mar Group helps micro-cap companies structure their growth. Micro-capitalized companies are those with less than $50,000,000 in equity, sometimes under $1,000,000. Restructuring involves raising money (both debt and stock), and planning how they will eventually harvest that wealth. If you’re a founder or investor, the secret to harvesting your equity is to possess assets with a developed market for their sale; up until recently, that market was the public market. Now, Over-The-Counter Securities (“OTC Securities”) don’t serve that purpose since, unless you’re a tech unicorn doing an IPO, there are essentially no ways to sell the shares you’ve invested in. OTC securities – how they were deposited five years ago. Brokerages all around the country have tightened compliance over the past five years to the point where no one may deposit share certificates into their brokerage accounts, even if they can prove that they paid for them. Consider the following demand from a secondary ...

Understanding financial statement

The financial statement is a written record of financial activities that gives an overview of financials results and conditions. Financial statement has three basic components: balance sheet which is an overview of assets, liabilities and equity on a particular date, income statement shows net income of the company during a set period of time and cash flow statement which shows inflow and outflow of cash caused by company's activities during stated period of time. Financial statements are often audited to ensure accuracy for tax, financing and investing purposes. Balance sheet reports your net worth at a particular point in time; you can understand it as snapshot in time, usually at the end of the fiscal year. It summarizes all financial data in three categories, assets, liabilities and equity. Assets are tangible objects of financial value owned by the company. Liability is debt owed to a creditor and Equity is a net difference when total liabilities ...

The Bad Actor rule of Regulation D

On July 10, 2013 the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted bad actor disqualification provision for Rule 506 of Regulation D under Securities Act of 1933, to implement Section 926 of Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The disqualification and related disclosure provision appear as paragraphs (d) and (e) of Rule 506, of Regulation D. The Bad Actor rule prohibits company (the issuer) to use registration exemption if the issuer or any other associated person has been convicted of or subjected to judicial or regulatory sanctions for certain violation of U.S law. Exemption from registration under Regulation D helps thousand of businesses to raise capital worth billions of dollars. T he “Bad Actor” rule is codified as new paragraphs (d) and (e) to Rule 506.  Rule 506(d) provides that the exemptions in Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) are not available if the issuer or any associated person is statutorily disqualified. This includes all of the following: ...